ASIAN Countries’ Strategies towards the European Union in an Inter-regionalist Context pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載 2025

簡體網頁||繁體網頁

☆☆☆☆☆

圖書標籤:

• 亞洲
• 歐盟
• 區域主義
• 國際關係
• 外交政策
• 地緣政治
• 比較政治
• 亞洲-歐盟關係
• 戰略
• 國際閤作

This is the first book on Asian countries’ strategies towards the EU. Since the introduction of Common Foreign and Security Policy in 1993 and the publication of the EU’s first strategic document on Asia one year later, hundreds of books and journal articles have been dedicated to the study of the EU policies towards Asia as a whole, or to individual Asian countries. However, very few of these researchers ever intended to explore the strategies of Asian countries, and Asian leaders’ mindsets, vis-à-vis the EU. Quite often, the policies of Asian countries towards the EU were simply interpreted as responses to the EU’s actions in Asia.

　　Having been passive players for decades, Asian countries are now increasingly willing to participate in the formulation of regional and global orders, for which they need to articulate their own strategies and the world needs to better understand their mindsets. In the past two years, in the framework of EU Centres in Asia-Pacific, some top Asian scholars on EU-Asian relations were brought together to debate the strategies of individual Asian countries towards the EU, and evaluate the EU’s actions in the region. In their eyes, the EU was interpreted as a normative power, a security player, a civilian promoter and a health-care supplier. Together, they aimed to establish some common rules for explaining Asian countries’ strategies towards the EU after in-depth study of the actions of individual countries in their bilateral relations with the EU.

　　This book is therefore indispensable to any efforts to understand Asian leaders’ mindset in the EU-Asian relations and their strategies towards the EU in the twenty-first century.

作者簡介

Contributors

　　Hsin-Chih Chen is Professor and Chair of the Department of Political Science at National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan.

　　Evi Fitriani is Head of the Department of International Relations and Lecturer of the master program of European Studies at University of Indonesia. She is also EU Visiting Fellow in 2005.

　　Just Castillo Iglesias is Lecturer of East Asian International Politics at the Open University of Catalonia, Spain. He is also an invited researcher at Osaka School of International Public Policy, Osaka University, Japan.

　　Rajendra K. Jain is Director of the Europe Area Studies Programme and Jean Monnet Chair at Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. He is also Adjunct Principal Research Fellow of Monash European and EU Studies Centre, Monash University, Melbourne.

　　Si Hong Kim is Professor of Sociology in the Department of EU Studies, the Graduate School of International & Area Studies at Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Korea. He is also Director of the HUFS-HRI EU Centre.

　　Makiko Nishitani is Associate Professor of International Relations at the Graduate School of International Cooperation Studies (GSICS), Kobe University, Japan.

　　Vincent Rollet is Assistant Professor at Wenzao Ursuline University of Languages and Research Associate at the French Centre for Research on Contemporary China (CEFC-Taipei) in Taiwan.

　　Hungdah Su is Professor and Jean Monnet Chair of the Department of Political Science at National Taiwan University and Director General of the European Union Centre in Taiwan.

　　Wai Ting is Professor in the Department of Government and International Studies at Hong Kong Baptist University and the President of the Hong Kong Association for European Studies.

　　Michito Tsuruoka is Senior Research Fellow at the National Institute for Defense Studies, Ministry of Defense, Japan and Research Fellow at The Tokyo Foundation.

　　Lay Hwee Yeo is Director of the European Union Centre in Singapore. She is also Council Secretary and Senior Research Fellow at the Singapore Institute of International Affairs and Adjunct Fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies.

Introduction / HUNGDAH SU

Part One: Asian Countries’ Strategies towards the EU

1.
China’s Strategy towards the EU: A Strategic Partner of No Strategic Significance?
WAI TING

2.
Japan’s Strategy towards the EU: A Strategic Partnership in Search of Common Goals
MICHITO TSURUOKA

3.
Korea’s Strategy towards the EU: From a Strategic Partner to a Privileged Partner
SI HONG KIM

4.
Taiwan’s Strategy towards the EU: From Hallstein Doctrine to Workable Diplomacy
HUNGDAH SU

5.
Indonesia’s Strategy toward the EU: Anti-colonialism, Non-alignment, and Equal Partnership
EVI FITRIANI

6.
ASEAN’s Strategy towards the EU: A Frame of Reference, a Partner and a Challenge
LAY HWEE YEO

7.
India’s Strategy towards the EU: Shared Values, but Elusive Coordinated Policies
RAJENDRA K. JAIN

Part Two: Asian Evaluation of EU’s Actions in the Context of EU-Asian Inter-regionalism

8.
The EU as a Normative Power in Asia: How Can the EU Adapt to Changing Chinese Diplomacy?
HSIN-CHIH CHEN

9.
The EU as a Security Player in Asia: Can the EU-China Strategic Partnership Be Compatible with the EU-Japan Strategic Partnership?
JUST CASTILLO IGLESIAS

10.
The EU as a Civilian Promoter in Asia: The Role of the ASEF and AEPF in the ASEM Process
MAKIKO NISHITANI

11.
The EU as a Health Actor in Asia: EU-Asian Interregional Response to Highly Pathogenic and (Re)emerging Diseases
VINCENT ROLLET

评分☆☆☆☆☆

最近看到一本關於亞洲國傢與歐洲聯盟互動的書，書名是《ASIAN Countries’ Strategies towards the European Union in an Inter-regionalist Context》。雖然我對學術性比較強的書籍可能需要一點時間消化，但這本書的標題確實引發瞭我對幾個核心問題的興趣。首先，亞洲國傢麵對歐盟這個已經高度整閤的區域組織，各自的「策略」是什麼？這個「策略」涵蓋的範圍有多廣？是僅限於經濟上的貿易協定，還是包含瞭政治上的外交協調、安全上的閤作，甚至文化上的交流推廣？其次，「跨區域主義」這個概念，讓人聯想到的是一種更為複雜的關係網絡，它暗示著亞洲與歐洲之間的互動，並非單純的雙邊關係，而是可能牽涉到更多的區域組織、多邊平颱，以及更廣泛的地緣政治考量。這本書的價值，或許就在於它能夠梳理齣這些複雜的脈絡，並呈現齣不同亞洲國傢在其中扮演的角色。例如，一些國傢可能是積極尋求與歐盟的夥伴關係，以藉助歐盟的影響力來推動自身發展；另一些國傢則可能更側重於維護自身區域的獨特性，並以較為謹慎的態度來應對與歐盟的接觸。我希望這本書能提供一些具體的案例研究，讓我們能夠更直觀地理解，在國際關係的大棋盤上，亞洲國傢是如何透過與歐洲聯盟的互動，來定義和實現自身的戰略目標。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

說實話，看到《ASIAN Countries’ Strategies towards the European Union in an Inter-regionalist Context》這本書的書名，我的第一反應其實是：「這大概又是哪種硬邦邦的學術著作吧？」。畢竟「跨區域主義」、「歐盟」這些詞彙，聽起來就跟平常我們茶餘飯後閒聊的內容有些距離。但是，稍微深入思考一下，就會發現這本書探討的主題，其實跟我們的生活息息相關。想想看，歐洲跟亞洲，是世界上兩個舉足輕重的區域。歐洲有歐盟這樣一個獨特的整閤模式，從經濟上的單一市場，到政治上的共同決策，對世界各國都有深遠的影響。而亞洲，更是充滿活力和潛力的區域，各國的發展模式和國際戰略都各具特色。這本書就是試圖去解析，在這樣一個相互依存又彼此競爭的全球格局下，亞洲各國是如何「定位」自己，以及他們與歐盟這個「他者」之間，是如何建構和維護關係的。它不僅僅是分析國傢層麵的政策，更可能深入到各國決策者在思考區域閤作和對外關係時，所採用的「戰略思維」本身。這種思維，往往受到歷史、文化、地緣政治等多重因素的影響，所以，這本書或許能幫助我們理解，為什麼某些亞洲國傢會選擇與歐盟建立更緊密的夥伴關係，而另一些國傢則可能採取相對謹慎的態度。對我來說，這是一個瞭解全球化進程中，區域力量如何演變的絕佳機會，也可能間接提供我們反思颱灣自身在區域整閤和國際外交上的可能路徑。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

最近偶然看到一本關於亞洲國傢如何看待歐盟的書，書名叫做《ASIAN Countries’ Strategies towards the European Union in an Inter-regionalist Context》。光是書名就夠讓人深思的瞭，畢竟颱灣本身就處在一個東亞跟西方的交界地帶，對於區域閤作、國際關係的看法，總是比較能夠同理不同國傢和地區的立場。我一直覺得，單純從單一國傢的角度去理解國際政治，是相對片麵的，需要有更宏觀的視野，纔能掌握住整個局勢的流動。這本書恰好提供瞭一個這樣的視角，去探討亞洲國傢，也就是我們熟悉的日本、韓國、中國，甚至還有東南亞一些國傢，他們在麵對一個像是歐洲聯盟這樣一個龐大、成熟的區域整閤體時，各自又是抱持著什麼樣的策略和思考呢？尤其是在「跨區域主義」（Inter-regionalism）這個概念下，更凸顯瞭國傢之間不隻是單打獨鬥，而是透過區域與區域之間的互動，來形塑彼此的戰略。這本書的切入點，我覺得非常重要，它不是在談亞洲國傢「加入」歐盟，也不是在談亞洲國傢「對抗」歐盟，而是更細膩地去分析，在一個全球化的時代，區域主義如何從單純的區域內閤作，延伸到區域與區域之間的複雜連結。作為一個關心颱灣在國際上地位的讀者，我會很有興趣瞭解，這些亞洲國傢在與歐盟互動的過程中，究竟學到瞭什麼？又或者，他們是如何利用與歐盟的關係，來強化自身的區域影響力，甚至在更廣泛的國際舞颱上發聲？這些問題，往往牽涉到經濟、政治、文化等各個層麵，也考驗著各國的智慧和判斷。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

身為一個對國際事務抱持高度好奇的颱灣人，讀到《ASIAN Countries’ Strategies towards the European Union in an Inter-regionalist Context》這個書名，就讓我覺得很有啟發性。我們常聽到「區域主義」這個概念，但「跨區域主義」顯然更進瞭一步，它強調的是區域與區域之間的互動，而不僅僅是區域內部的事務。這本書正好切中瞭這個重要的議題：亞洲國傢，這個多元且快速變遷的集閤體，在麵對以歐洲聯盟為代錶的成熟區域組織時，究竟採取瞭怎樣的策略？這讓我聯想到，颱灣雖然不是歐盟的成員，但我們與歐洲的貿易、文化交流卻非常頻繁。而亞洲其他國傢，如日本、韓國，他們在這方麵又有什麼樣的獨到之處？這本書或許會深入探討，他們是透過哪些具體的措施，例如簽署自由貿易協定、進行政策對話、參與多邊機製等等，來與歐盟建立聯繫，甚至尋求閤作機會。更重要的是，在「跨區域主義」的框架下，這些策略背後，是否隱藏著更深層的國傢利益考量，以及對未來國際秩序的想像？我很好奇，書中會不會呈現齣亞洲國傢在與歐盟互動時，展現齣的自主性、彈性，甚至是創新性，而不是被動地接受歐盟的影響。這對我們理解當代國際政治的複雜性，以及亞洲在全球舞颱上日益增強的影響力，絕對是很有幫助的。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

翻開《ASIAN Countries’ Strategies towards the European Union in an Inter-regionalist Context》的書名，我腦海中立刻浮現齣颱灣在國際社會中，如何尋求自身定位的畫麵。這本書所探討的「跨區域主義」，是一個非常吸引人的視角。它跳脫瞭傳統的單一國傢對抗或閤作的框架，而是將目光聚焦在區域與區域之間的互動。亞洲，這個充滿活力和多樣性的區域，與歐盟這個在歐洲大陸上建立瞭深厚閤作基礎的組織，之間存在著怎樣的戰略聯繫？這本書或許會深入剖析，亞洲各國，例如中國、日本、韓國，以及東南亞的一些國傢，他們在麵對歐盟時，是如何運用「策略」來爭取利益、降低風險，甚至塑造更符閤自身期望的國際秩序。我特別好奇的是，書中是否會探討到，這些亞洲國傢在與歐盟互動的過程中，是如何平衡自身在區域內部的利益，以及與全球主要經濟體之間的關係。例如，一個國傢在與歐盟建立良好關係的同時，是否也會考量到與其他亞洲鄰國的互動模式？這種策略的製定，勢必牽涉到對歐盟政治、經濟、社會結構的理解，以及對自身發展模式的清晰認知。對於我們這些長期關注國際局勢的讀者來說，能夠從亞洲國傢的視角來理解他們與歐盟的關係，將有助於我們更全麵地認識當代世界權力格局的演變，以及區域閤作在其中扮演的關鍵角色。