具体描述
The focus of this first volume is the EEC’s relations with the Republic of China located in Taiwan covering the period of the 1950s to the 1970s but particularly the 1960s-1970s in the context of the People’s Republic of China coming onto the world stage based on archival materials collected from the Archives of the European Commission and the Council of Ministers. The authors let the archives speak, so to speak; hence, the extensive archival references at the end of each chapter. In setting this time period, the authors in this volume have chosen to relate the story in a chronological order as far as possible. The advantage of this approach is that it gives a kind of “daily life”, dynamism of the relations between both sides as issues and events unfold. Gaps in re-counting what happened required the use of two secondary sources on trade ties especially for the early years of the 1950s and 1960s.During this time period with its economic and political dimensions, the crux is state recognition, diplomatic relations and trade relations. Starting with the Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States of 1933a State is defined as follows: “The State as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications: a) a permanent population; b) a defined territory; c) government; and d) capacity to enter into relations with other states.”1 However, fulfilling all the criteria for statehood does not automatically mean that other states will grant recognition. Granting state recognition is at the discretion of states affected by political considerations and vested interests.
好的，这是一本关于欧洲经济共同体（EEC）在冷战初期（20世纪50年代至70年代）与东亚地区国家关系研究的专著的详细简介，重点关注其在特定区域的政治、经济和战略考量，完全不涉及您提到的《The EU and Taiwan Relationship (1950s-1970s)》。 欧洲的全球拓展：战后初期（1950s-1970s）欧洲经济共同体与东亚的战略交汇 作者：[此处留空，模拟书籍作者信息] 出版社：[此处留空，模拟书籍出版信息] 页码：[此处留空，模拟书籍信息] 导言：冷战格局下的“欧洲集团”的全球视野 本书深入探讨了欧洲经济共同体（EEC）在成立之初的二十年间（约1958年至1970年代末），其在东亚地区建立和发展政治经济联系的复杂历程。这一时期，欧洲正处于战后重建与身份重塑的关键阶段，而东亚则被深刻地卷入美苏两极对抗的漩涡之中，见证了多个新兴民族国家的崛起和区域冲突的爆发。 传统的欧洲历史叙事往往聚焦于共同体在西欧内部的整合进程，或其与前殖民地（特别是非洲）的特殊关系。然而，本研究旨在揭示一个经常被忽视的面向：EEC作为一个新兴的、具有强大经济潜力的政治实体，如何审慎地将其目光投向遥远的东亚，并试图在该地区建立一套不同于传统殖民权力或纯粹美国外交政策的互动模式。这种互动是基于经济互补性、对新兴市场的渴望，以及在冷战意识形态冲突中寻求“第三条道路”的微妙平衡。 本书的核心论点在于，EEC在1950年代至1970年代对东亚的参与，并非一个统一、连贯的对外政策产物，而是一系列成员国（特别是法、德、意）的国家利益驱动、共同体机构的探索性试探以及区域地缘政治现实相互作用的复杂结果。通过详尽的档案挖掘和制度分析，本书力图重构这一时期欧洲与东亚地区互动的基础逻辑与战略限度。 第一部分：共同体框架的形成与对外姿态的早期界定（1950s – 1960s初） 在共同体成立初期，其首要任务是巩固内部市场与确立共同农业政策（CAP）。然而，经济一体化的成功，不可避免地引发了其对外关系的思考。本部分考察了《罗马条约》签署后，共同体如何在其章程中为对外经济合作预留空间，并初步界定了其与“远东”的接触方式。 第一章：从关贸总协定（GATT）到区域接触点：经济主权与贸易工具 本章分析了EEC如何通过GATT框架，与日本、韩国等工业化（或半工业化）的东亚经济体进行早期的贸易磋商。研究重点在于，当欧洲国家试图以一个共同体身份参与全球贸易时，如何处理成员国之间关于特定东亚产品（如纺织品、初级工业品）的竞争与协调问题。这些早期的贸易谈判，构成了EEC对该地区政治意图的“试水”。 第二章：法国的“独立外交”与东亚的缺席 戴高乐主义对欧洲整合的深刻影响，在本部分占据核心地位。我们考察了法国在这一时期试图推行的独立外交政策，特别是在东南亚的某些接触，以及它如何与共同体整体的、更倾向于美式集团框架的战略保持张力。虽然法国的重点在于非洲和中东，但其对亚洲地区事务的谨慎关注，反映了欧洲对一个具有自主外交身份的渴望。 第三章：经济“奇迹”的吸引力：对日本经验的初步观察 本章对比分析了德国和意大利在面对战后日本经济复苏时的不同心态。对于重工业基础的德国而言，日本既是潜在的竞争对手，也是技术和管理经验的提供者。研究展示了早期欧洲商界和技术官僚如何评估日本模式，并将其纳入欧洲内部的经济现代化讨论中。 第二部分：地缘政治的压力与共同体的谨慎介入（1960s中期 – 1970s初） 随着越南战争的升级以及东亚区域政治格局的持续动荡，EEC的对外角色变得更加微妙。此时的欧洲，一方面需要维护与美国的跨大西洋关系，另一方面又试图在亚洲冲突中保持某种程度的超脱，以维护其全球贸易伙伴的地位。 第四章：中立的尝试与“马歇尔计划”的阴影：对新兴国家的接触 本章聚焦于EEC在与南亚和东南亚新兴国家（如印度、巴基斯坦、印度尼西亚）发展经济援助关系时的策略。研究表明，共同体的援助方案（如非优惠性援助或技术合作），旨在避免重复美国或苏联的意识形态捆绑，但其资源规模和政治敏感性使其难以真正成为一个独立的地区稳定力量。这些接触主要通过双边渠道，辅以共同体层面的协调。 第五章：韩朝冲突的余波与欧洲对“秩序”的偏好 冷战在朝鲜半岛的持续紧张，对欧洲决策者产生了深远影响。本部分分析了在特定冲突升级时期，EEC成员国在联合国以及其他国际场合中对区域稳定的立场。尽管欧洲没有直接的军事介入能力，但其对东亚地区维持贸易畅通和政治稳定的诉求，使其在外交辞令上趋向于维护现有的国际秩序，这在客观上更倾向于美国的战略布局。 第六章：台湾海峡的“看不见的边界”：对区域平衡的间接影响 本章细致考察了EEC的成员国在处理其与亚洲非政府实体关系时的微妙平衡。研究集中于欧洲企业界和部分政府机构，如何处理与该区域内不同政权之间的非官方或半官方经济往来。由于欧洲自身也面临身份认同的挑战，其对亚洲岛屿政治实体关系的审慎态度，反映了其对国际承认与商业利益之间界限的深刻理解。这种谨慎，往往表现为在官方声明中的“模糊性”与私下经济接触的“实用性”之间的张力。 第三部分：从共同体到共同体：机构成熟与东亚视角的转变（1970s） 进入1970年代，随着英国的加入以及共同体向共同体（EC）的演变，其对外政策能力得到加强。东亚地区也经历了重大的外交转向，特别是美国与中国的接触（“乒乓外交”）。这一系列的外部变化，迫使欧洲重新校准其在远东的战略定位。 第七章：欧共体职能的扩展与亚洲战略的制度化缺位 随着共同外交与安全政策（CFSP）的早期萌芽，本章探讨了欧洲机构试图系统性地将东亚纳入其对外政策视野的努力。然而，研究发现，尽管有制度层面的意图，但由于成员国之间在亚洲安全问题上的核心利益分歧依然巨大，任何统一的“亚洲政策”都难以形成实质性的制度约束。东亚事务的决策权，在很大程度上仍保留在成员国外交部手中。 第八章：日本：从竞争者到首要伙伴的过渡 1970年代，面对石油危机和全球经济的结构性变化，欧洲与日本的关系进入了一个新的阶段。本章分析了双方在技术合作、货币政策协调以及全球贸易治理（如多边纺织品协定）方面的深入接触。这种关系的核心，是认识到双方都是被美国主导的体系所制约的、但又拥有巨大市场和技术实力的“非美西方”力量。 结论：欧洲的区域抱负与地缘政治的现实 本书的结论认为，在1950年代至1970年代，欧洲经济共同体在东亚的关系史，是一部“高期望与低执行力”的历史。共同体作为一个整体，成功地将自己确立为一个重要的全球贸易参与者，并与东亚的工业经济体建立了稳固的经济纽带。然而，受制于内部的政治分歧（特别是法德路线的差异）、对美国安全体系的依赖，以及对地区安全事务的政治意愿不足，共同体未能发展出一种具有独立战略影响力的东亚外交。它的存在，更多地是作为一个经济力量投射体，而非一个地缘政治的调解者或安全保障者。这种克制的参与，恰恰是其冷战时期身份认同的深刻体现。本书为理解战后欧洲的全球角色提供了一个关键的、非大西洋主义视角的分析框架。
著者信息
作者简介
Dr. Chong-ko Peter Tzou (邹忠科)
PhD of Vienna University,Austria.
Present position is Professor of Graduate Institute of European Studies, Tamkang University, Taipei, Taiwan, was the former Director of Graduate Institute of European Studies and European Union Center Studies of Tamkang University.
His subjects are European Integration, European Union, European External Relations.
As Visiting Professor, has been in many European, American and Asian Universities, for example Vienna University, Mainz University, Munich University, Oxford and Cambridge University, First Rom University, UCLA, American University , Tokyo University, Waseda University ,Seoul University and Moskau University, etc.
Dozens of books and articles of European integration, European Union , European affairs and European External Relations, had been published. Such as” The History of European Union”, and” The Higher Education Integration in the EU and the Major Trends of the World Higher Education in the 21st Century”, etc.
Current research interest: Taiwan-EU Relations, The EU Energy Policy and Environmental Protection , the European Transitional Justice and Taiwan.
Dr. Paul Joseph Lim
Paul Joseph Lim is now a pensioner but since the 1 April 2013 is a Visiting Fellow of the Ministry of Foreign Affair of the Republic of China, Taiwan, hosted by the European Union Centre in Taiwan at the National Taiwan University.
Until December 2012, he was Professor and Head of the Centre for European Studies in the Institute for Occidental Studies (IKON), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia which he joined in 2010. He had served 5 years in Universiti Sains Malaysia (2002-2007) as Coordinator of the European Studies Programme. The rest of his employment history had been as a Co-Founder of the European Institute for Asian Studies (EIAS), Brussels, in 1989 and becoming its Research Coordinator and lastly its Acting Deputy Director between 2007 and 2010. However, he has also been a Political Adviser for Asia with a political group in the European Parliament in the late 1980s and 1990s.
He obtained his Licence and Doctorate at the Université Catholique de Louvain, Belgium.
As a researcher, Dr. Lim’s focus is on the European Union’s External Relations, in particular, with Asia in its different facets.
His latest publications in 2013 were “European Union’s Statements on Asia security” in “Strategic Vision for Taiwan Security”, Volume 2, Issue 10, August 2013, magazine of the Center for Security Studies, Institute for International Relations, National Chengchi University, “The European Union’s cooperative relations with Asia with a look-in on: Disturbances and Regional Challenges in East Asia” in the Tamkang Journal of International Affairs, Volume XVII, No. II and “What has ASEAN offered or could offer to the European Union in their relationship” in ASEAN Outlook, December 2013, No. 008, publication of the Taiwan ASEAN Studies Center of the Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research.
His Fellowship in Taiwan in his retirement is researching and writing a book on Taiwan-EEC/EEC-Taiwan Relations in the 1970s in cooperation with Prof. Chong-ko Peter Tzou which will be published in Taiwan in 2015.
Dr. Chong-ko Peter Tzou (邹忠科)
PhD of Vienna University,Austria.
Present position is Professor of Graduate Institute of European Studies, Tamkang University, Taipei, Taiwan, was the former Director of Graduate Institute of European Studies and European Union Center Studies of Tamkang University.
His subjects are European Integration, European Union, European External Relations.
As Visiting Professor, has been in many European, American and Asian Universities, for example Vienna University, Mainz University, Munich University, Oxford and Cambridge University, First Rom University, UCLA, American University , Tokyo University, Waseda University ,Seoul University and Moskau University, etc.
Dozens of books and articles of European integration, European Union , European affairs and European External Relations, had been published. Such as” The History of European Union”, and” The Higher Education Integration in the EU and the Major Trends of the World Higher Education in the 21st Century”, etc.
Current research interest: Taiwan-EU Relations, The EU Energy Policy and Environmental Protection , the European Transitional Justice and Taiwan.
Dr. Paul Joseph Lim
Paul Joseph Lim is now a pensioner but since the 1 April 2013 is a Visiting Fellow of the Ministry of Foreign Affair of the Republic of China, Taiwan, hosted by the European Union Centre in Taiwan at the National Taiwan University.
Until December 2012, he was Professor and Head of the Centre for European Studies in the Institute for Occidental Studies (IKON), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia which he joined in 2010. He had served 5 years in Universiti Sains Malaysia (2002-2007) as Coordinator of the European Studies Programme. The rest of his employment history had been as a Co-Founder of the European Institute for Asian Studies (EIAS), Brussels, in 1989 and becoming its Research Coordinator and lastly its Acting Deputy Director between 2007 and 2010. However, he has also been a Political Adviser for Asia with a political group in the European Parliament in the late 1980s and 1990s.
He obtained his Licence and Doctorate at the Université Catholique de Louvain, Belgium.
As a researcher, Dr. Lim’s focus is on the European Union’s External Relations, in particular, with Asia in its different facets.
His latest publications in 2013 were “European Union’s Statements on Asia security” in “Strategic Vision for Taiwan Security”, Volume 2, Issue 10, August 2013, magazine of the Center for Security Studies, Institute for International Relations, National Chengchi University, “The European Union’s cooperative relations with Asia with a look-in on: Disturbances and Regional Challenges in East Asia” in the Tamkang Journal of International Affairs, Volume XVII, No. II and “What has ASEAN offered or could offer to the European Union in their relationship” in ASEAN Outlook, December 2013, No. 008, publication of the Taiwan ASEAN Studies Center of the Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research.
His Fellowship in Taiwan in his retirement is researching and writing a book on Taiwan-EEC/EEC-Taiwan Relations in the 1970s in cooperation with Prof. Chong-ko Peter Tzou which will be published in Taiwan in 2015.
图书目录
Preface
Acknowledgement
Introduction
Chapter I: The European Communities’ relations with the ROC (Taiwan) in the 1950’s and 1960’s
Chapter II: The PRC looms over the EEC’s relations with the ROC and the impact of the ROC’s departure from the UN in 1971 on this relationship with the EEC to the end of 1975
Chapter III: The beginnings and establishment of relations between EEC’s Member States and the PRC culminating with EEC itself and the PRC in 1975
Chapter IV: From diplomatic relation to a trade agreement in 1978 while Taiwan fades away politically and faces further import restrictions and anti-dumping
Chapter V: From EEC-PRC Trade Agreement to the EEC-PRC Textile Trade Agreement in 1979 and continued imports restrictions on Taiwanese products
Conclusion to the Chapters
Acknowledgement
Introduction
Chapter I: The European Communities’ relations with the ROC (Taiwan) in the 1950’s and 1960’s
Chapter II: The PRC looms over the EEC’s relations with the ROC and the impact of the ROC’s departure from the UN in 1971 on this relationship with the EEC to the end of 1975
Chapter III: The beginnings and establishment of relations between EEC’s Member States and the PRC culminating with EEC itself and the PRC in 1975
Chapter IV: From diplomatic relation to a trade agreement in 1978 while Taiwan fades away politically and faces further import restrictions and anti-dumping
Chapter V: From EEC-PRC Trade Agreement to the EEC-PRC Textile Trade Agreement in 1979 and continued imports restrictions on Taiwanese products
Conclusion to the Chapters
图书序言
图书试读
INTRODUCTION
The focus of this first volume is the EEC’s relations with the Republic of China located in Taiwan covering the period of the 1950s to the 1970s but particularly the 1960s-1970s in the context of the People’s Republic of China coming onto the world stage based on archival materials collected from the Archives of the European Commission and the Council of Ministers.
The authors let the archives speak, so to speak; hence, the extensive archival references at the end of each chapter. In setting this time period, the authors in this volume have chosen to relate the story in a chronological order as far as possible. The advantage of this approach is that it gives a kind of “daily life”, dynamism of the relations between both sides as issues and events unfold. Gaps in re-counting what happened required the use of two secondary sources on trade ties especially for the early years of the 1950s and 1960s.During this time period with its economic and political dimensions, the crux is state recognition, diplomatic relations and trade relations. Starting with the Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States of 1933a State is defined as follows: “The State as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications: a) a permanent population; b) a defined territory; c) government; and d) capacity to enter into relations with other states.”1 However, fulfilling all the criteria for statehood does not automatically mean that other states will grant recognition. Granting state recognition is at the discretion of states affected by political considerations and vested interests.
The focus of this first volume is the EEC’s relations with the Republic of China located in Taiwan covering the period of the 1950s to the 1970s but particularly the 1960s-1970s in the context of the People’s Republic of China coming onto the world stage based on archival materials collected from the Archives of the European Commission and the Council of Ministers.
The authors let the archives speak, so to speak; hence, the extensive archival references at the end of each chapter. In setting this time period, the authors in this volume have chosen to relate the story in a chronological order as far as possible. The advantage of this approach is that it gives a kind of “daily life”, dynamism of the relations between both sides as issues and events unfold. Gaps in re-counting what happened required the use of two secondary sources on trade ties especially for the early years of the 1950s and 1960s.During this time period with its economic and political dimensions, the crux is state recognition, diplomatic relations and trade relations. Starting with the Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States of 1933a State is defined as follows: “The State as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications: a) a permanent population; b) a defined territory; c) government; and d) capacity to enter into relations with other states.”1 However, fulfilling all the criteria for statehood does not automatically mean that other states will grant recognition. Granting state recognition is at the discretion of states affected by political considerations and vested interests.
用户评价
评分
這本書的書名，當初看到時，就讓我有些好奇。畢竟，台灣與歐洲的關係，尤其是在冷戰初期到解嚴前夕這段時間，似乎總是被中美關係、台海局勢的光芒所掩蓋，鮮為人知。許多歷史學家或研究者，在談論台灣的國際空間時，往往聚焦於亞洲鄰國、或是美國的援助與軍事協防。然而，歐洲，這個充滿了歷史厚重感與地緣政治複雜性的歐陸，與台灣的互動，究竟是怎樣的面貌？書名中的「歐盟」，雖然我們都知道，現今的歐盟是歐洲統合的具體成果，但在1950年代到1970年代，這段時間的歐洲，正處於戰後重建、冷戰對峙，以及會員國之間關係不斷演變的階段。當時的歐洲，是什麼樣的政治經濟格局？與台灣的關係，又是基於什麼樣的考量？是共同的價值觀？經濟利益？還是地緣戰略的連帶？台灣當時的國際處境，又如何影響著與這些歐洲國家的互動？這段時間，正是台灣從戰後初期戒嚴、經濟起飛，到逐漸走向開放的關鍵時期。在這複雜的脈絡下，台灣與歐洲各國，甚至與當時歐洲共同體的前身，是否存在著一些不為人知的連結？書名引發的諸多疑問，都讓人渴望深入了解這段被忽視的歷史。
评分讀到這本書名，我立刻聯想到了自己成長過程中，對於歐洲的刻板印象，以及那段時期台灣在國際社會中的孤立感。1950年代到1970年代，對於許多台灣人來說，歐洲往往意味著遙遠的文化、藝術，以及一些知名品牌的發源地，但在地緣政治上，似乎與台灣的關係並不緊密。然而，台灣在這段時期，其實面臨著巨大的外交壓力，許多國家基於現實政治考量，紛紛轉向承認中華人民共和國。在這股浪潮中，台灣如何維持與歐洲國家的聯繫？書名中的「歐盟」雖然是後來的概念，但它指向了歐洲一體化的發展趨勢，以及當時歐洲各國在國際事務上的協調與互動。這本書，或許能夠填補我們對這段歷史的認知空白，揭示在美蘇冷戰的大背景下，台灣與歐洲各國之間，是否存在著一些不為人知的經濟、政治，甚至是戰略上的默契或合作。這些互動，是基於共同的意識形態，還是務實的利益考量？歐洲國家當時的對台政策，又是如何演變的？這段被忽略的歷史，或許能讓我們更深刻地理解台灣在國際舞台上的掙扎與努力。
评分我對歷史研究的興趣，總是會驅使我去挖掘那些被大眾所忽略的角落。當我看到《The EU and Taiwan Relationship (1950s-1970s)》這個書名時，腦海中立刻浮現出一個模糊的輪廓。1950年代到1970年代，這個時間段，對於台灣來說，充滿了挑戰與轉型。一方面，我們面臨著國際社會的承認危機，另一方面，經濟也在逐步發展，社會結構也在悄然變化。而歐洲，當時正經歷著戰後重建、冷戰對峙，以及歐洲一體化的初步探索。書名中的「歐盟」，雖然是這段時間之後才形成的組織，但它暗示著歐洲國家之間的聯繫與協調。那麼，在這段歷史時期，台灣與歐洲各國的「關係」究竟是怎樣的？是單純的商業往來？還是有更深層次的政治或戰略意涵？台灣當時的國際空間有多大，又如何與歐洲國家進行互動？歐洲的政治格局，當時又是如何影響著他們對台灣的態度？這本書，或許能夠為我們提供一個獨特的視角，去探究在那樣一個複雜的國際環境下，台灣與歐洲之間，是如何建立聯繫，又如何應對時代的變遷，這段歷史細節，對於理解台灣今日的國際地位，一定有其重要的啟示意義。
评分坦白說，當我看到這本書名的時候，腦海中第一個浮現的並非具體的歷史事件，而是一種既熟悉又陌生的感覺。熟悉的是，「歐洲」和「台灣」這兩個名詞，它們各自承載著我們對世界的想像，但當它們被「關係」這個詞連結起來，尤其是跨越了1950年代到1970年代這個時間軸，就顯得有些撲朔迷離。那是一個怎麼樣的時代背景？冷戰的陰影籠罩全球，歐洲正處於東西方對峙的前線，同時也在進行著戰後的重建與區域合作的探索。而台灣，則是在兩岸對峙的格局下，努力尋求國際支持與發展自身。這兩者之間的「關係」，究竟是怎樣的互動模式？是官方層面的外交承認與聯繫？還是民間的經貿往來與文化交流？書名中「歐盟」這個詞，雖然出現在歷史的時間段之後，但它暗示著歐洲一體化的潛力，以及當時歐洲國家之間互動的複雜性。這本書，或許能夠揭示，在這段被認為是戰略上被邊緣化的時期，台灣與歐洲各國之間，是否存在著一些超越政治表象的、更為深層的聯繫，這些聯繫，又如何影響了當時的國際格局，以及台灣自身的發展軌跡？
评分我一直對台灣的國際參與史，特別是與非英語系國家的外交關係，充滿了濃厚的興趣。我們從小被教導的國際關係，總是以美國為中心，或是圍繞著聯合國的承認問題打轉。然而，在1950到1970年代，歐洲大陸正經歷著劃時代的變革，從戰後的廢墟中逐步走向合作，歐洲經濟共同體（EEC）的成立，標誌著歐洲一體化進程的加速。這段時期，台灣在國際舞台上的地位，經歷了極大的挑戰，許多國家礙於現實考量，紛紛與中華人民共和國建交，這對台灣而言無疑是巨大的壓力。在這股國際勢力的變動中，台灣如何維繫與歐洲國家的關係？這些歐洲國家，在當時是基於什麼樣的戰略眼光，或是經濟誘因，來與台灣進行互動？是否存在著一些鮮為人知的經貿合作，或是文化交流的契機？歐洲的民主轉型與經濟發展，是否也為台灣提供了一些值得借鑑的經驗？這本書名所指向的年代，恰巧是台灣在世界舞台上尋求立足的艱難時期，歐洲的動向，及其與台灣的關係，勢必牽涉到許多重要的歷史細節，而這些細節，或許能夠為我們理解台灣的國際處境，提供一個全新的視角，打破過去單一面向的認知框架。
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 ttbooks.qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小特书站 版权所有